<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>01213pamaa2200109   4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">0000035876</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20110405090000.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Matsumato </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="4">
   <subfield code="a">The Accounting Review : </subfield>
   <subfield code="b">vol. 77, No. 2, 2002.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">26cm.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Recent reports in the business press allege that managers take actions to avoid negative earnings surprises. I hypothesize that certain firm characteristics are associated with greater incentives to avoid negative surprises. I find that firms with higher transient institutional ownership, greater reliance on implicit claims with their stakeholders, and higher value-relevance of earnings are more likely to meet or exceed expectations at the earnings announcement.&#13;
&#13;
I also examine whether firms manage earnings upward or guide analysts' forecasts downward to avoid missing expectations at the earnings announcement. I examine the relation between firm characteristics and the probability (conditional on meeting analysts' expectations) of having (1) positive abnormal accruals, and (2) forecasts that are lower than expected (using a model of prior earnings changes). Overall, the results suggest that both mechanisms play a role in avoiding negative earnings surprises.&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Journal </subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
